model output
Appendix A Proof of Theorem 2.1
We have the following lemma. Using the notation of Lemma A.1, we have E The third inequality uses the Lipschitz assumption of the loss function. Figure 10 supplements'Relation to disagreement ' at the end of Section 2. It shows an example where the behavior of inconsistency is different from disagreement. All the experiments were done using GPUs (A100 or older). The goal of the experiments reported in Section 3.1 was to find whether/how the predictiveness of The arrows indicate the direction of training becoming longer.
- Asia > Singapore (0.14)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Chatbot (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Biomedical Informatics (0.93)
- Europe > France (0.15)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- (28 more...)
- Transportation > Passenger (1.00)
- Transportation > Marine (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports > Football (1.00)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.04)
- North America > United States > Indiana (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- (11 more...)
- Asia > China > Guangdong Province > Guangzhou (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- North America > United States > Ohio (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Law Enforcement & Public Safety (1.00)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- (4 more...)
- Health & Medicine (0.93)
- Education > Educational Setting (0.32)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Memory-Based Learning > Rote Learning (0.62)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.49)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (0.48)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Inductive Learning (0.48)
Supplementary Material for DeWave: Discrete Encoding of EEG Waves for EEG to Text Translation
In this material, we will give more technical details as well as additional experiments to support the main paper. The overview of the proposed framework, DeWave, is illustrated in Figure 6. The dataset is split into training (80%), development (10%), and testing (10%) sets, comprising 10,874, 1,387, and 1,387 unique sentences, respectively, with no overlap. We release our implementation code through GitHub to contribute to this area. Section 3.3, where a 6-layer CNN encoder slides through the whole wave and gets the embedding The codex encoder shares the same structure with word-level features.
- North America > United States > California (0.05)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.05)
- North America > United States > Florida > Dade County (0.04)
- (9 more...)
Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels
We propose a novel framework to perform classification via deep learning in the presence of noisy annotations. When trained on noisy labels, deep neural networks have been observed to first fit the training data with clean labels during an early learning phase, before eventually memorizing the examples with false labels. We prove that early learning and memorization are fundamental phenomena in high-dimensional classification tasks, even in simple linear models, and give a theoretical explanation in this setting. Motivated by these findings, we develop a new technique for noisy classification tasks, which exploits the progress of the early learning phase. In contrast with existing approaches, which use the model output during early learning to detect the examples with clean labels, and either ignore or attempt to correct the false labels, we take a different route and instead capitalize on early learning via regularization. There are two key elements to our approach. First, we leverage semi-supervised learning techniques to produce target probabilities based on the model outputs. Second, we design a regularization term that steers the model towards these targets, implicitly preventing memorization of the false labels. The resulting framework is shown to provide robustness to noisy annotations on several standard benchmarks and real-world datasets, where it achieves results comparable to the state of the art.
A theoretical case-study of Scalable Oversight in Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
A key source of complexity in next-generation AI models is the size of model outputs, making it time-consuming to parse and provide reliable feedback on. To ensure such models are aligned, we will need to bolster our understanding of scalable oversight and how to scale up human feedback. To this end, we study the challenges of scalable oversight in the context of goal-conditioned hierarchical reinforcement learning. Hierarchical structure is a promising entrypoint into studying how to scale up human feedback, which in this work we assume can only be provided for model outputs below a threshold size. In the cardinal feedback setting, we develop an apt sub-MDP reward and algorithm that allows us to acquire and scale up low-level feedback for learning with sublinear regret. In the ordinal feedback setting, we show the necessity of both high-and low-level feedback, and develop a hierarchical experimental design algorithm that efficiently acquires both types of feedback for learning. Altogether, our work aims to consolidate the foundations of scalable oversight, formalizing and studying the various challenges thereof.